Week 15


Discussion (4) ¬

  1. Pau Amma

    I’m unsure why their statements in the report you linked makes them worthy of the award. Reading the previous awards, it seems to me that none of them boiled down to “laughable statements unlikely to incite hatred or harm”, which is the worst I can say of this week’s.

  2. Intern Mike

    ‘1000 years of darkness’ is inflammatory to the right ears as it is ridiculous to ours.

  3. Pau Amma

    Hmm. Not sure which are the right ears, then. I’m probably missing something, like what ‘1000 years of darkness” refers to. I took the whole thing to be preposterous, overblown US election-year political rhetoric.

  4. Intern Mike

    Gena Norris was quoting Reagan and the speech it was pulled from was intended to get Christian Evangelicals to vote. In this context I think it’s pretty incendiary. The reason I put it up for the Douche was because the GOP rhetoric is hitting hysteria levels in terms of either Romney gets elected or there’ll be a revolution. That’s far from civil and very far from the basic respect that President Obama deserves.

Comment ¬

NOTE - You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>