<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Golden Douche of the Week goes to Chuck and Gena Norris.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gppcomic.com/2012/09/07/the-golden-douche-of-the-week-goes-to-chuck-and-gena-norris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gppcomic.com/2012/09/07/the-golden-douche-of-the-week-goes-to-chuck-and-gena-norris/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 06:48:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Intern Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.gppcomic.com/2012/09/07/the-golden-douche-of-the-week-goes-to-chuck-and-gena-norris/comment-page-1/#comment-5949</link>
		<dc:creator>Intern Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gppcomic.com/?p=1676#comment-5949</guid>
		<description>Gena Norris was quoting Reagan and the speech it was pulled from was intended to get Christian Evangelicals to vote. In this context I think it&#039;s pretty incendiary. The reason I put it up for the Douche was because the GOP rhetoric is hitting hysteria levels in terms of either Romney gets elected or there&#039;ll be a revolution. That&#039;s far from civil and very far from the basic respect that President Obama deserves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gena Norris was quoting Reagan and the speech it was pulled from was intended to get Christian Evangelicals to vote. In this context I think it&#8217;s pretty incendiary. The reason I put it up for the Douche was because the GOP rhetoric is hitting hysteria levels in terms of either Romney gets elected or there&#8217;ll be a revolution. That&#8217;s far from civil and very far from the basic respect that President Obama deserves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pau Amma</title>
		<link>http://www.gppcomic.com/2012/09/07/the-golden-douche-of-the-week-goes-to-chuck-and-gena-norris/comment-page-1/#comment-5948</link>
		<dc:creator>Pau Amma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gppcomic.com/?p=1676#comment-5948</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Not sure which are the right ears, then. I&#039;m probably missing something, like what &#039;1000 years of darkness&quot; refers to. I took the whole thing to be preposterous, overblown US election-year political rhetoric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Not sure which are the right ears, then. I&#8217;m probably missing something, like what &#8216;1000 years of darkness&#8221; refers to. I took the whole thing to be preposterous, overblown US election-year political rhetoric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intern Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.gppcomic.com/2012/09/07/the-golden-douche-of-the-week-goes-to-chuck-and-gena-norris/comment-page-1/#comment-5894</link>
		<dc:creator>Intern Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2012 04:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gppcomic.com/?p=1676#comment-5894</guid>
		<description>&#039;1000 years of darkness&#039; is inflammatory to the right ears as it is ridiculous to ours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;1000 years of darkness&#8217; is inflammatory to the right ears as it is ridiculous to ours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pau Amma</title>
		<link>http://www.gppcomic.com/2012/09/07/the-golden-douche-of-the-week-goes-to-chuck-and-gena-norris/comment-page-1/#comment-5880</link>
		<dc:creator>Pau Amma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gppcomic.com/?p=1676#comment-5880</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m unsure why their statements in the report you linked makes them worthy of the award. Reading the previous awards, it seems to me that none of them boiled down to &quot;laughable statements unlikely to incite hatred or harm&quot;, which is the worst I can say of this week&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m unsure why their statements in the report you linked makes them worthy of the award. Reading the previous awards, it seems to me that none of them boiled down to &#8220;laughable statements unlikely to incite hatred or harm&#8221;, which is the worst I can say of this week&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
